Sim Insurgent

I remember playing Sim City as a kid I would leave the game on for hours, even when I wasn’t playing, and return to find my metropolis in flames. Then I would have to scramble to get everything back in working order, at which point the game would become boring, and I would abandon it again. For me, a city in crisis was more appealing than a stable one.

Still the game taught me to think about cities in ways I never had before. I was still in middle school at the time, and my conception of transportation and urban planning was next to nothing. Seeing the impact a well designed network of roads had on my digital domain did awaken a larger awareness of what makes a great city.

The military seems to have latched on to the idea that video games are good teaching tools. A new piece in the Atlantic details the development of a sort of Sim Iraq, where battalion commanders have to pacify an insurgent city by learning the social, cultural, economic and geographic needs of a diverse population.

I doubt any digital city can accurately predict the complex web of interactions that make up a real war zone. But as a thought exercise I believe the game could have real value. Apparently the game works off of real world data, and can be programmed to run “stories” tailored to fit different conflicts.

Over at Danger Room this topic has been bouncing around since 2007. The general consensus there seems to be while the concept is interesting, there’s not much value to these games, and anyone who thinks this will prepare our troops to understand an insurgency is just a couch commander with a hard on for control.

“John Nagl, who helped write the Army’s manual on defusing insurgencies, told Danger Room in 2007. “They are smoking something they shouldn’t be,” retired Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper quipped to Science magazine. ‘Only those who don’t know how the real world works will be suckers for this stuff.’”

I don’t think these games are anything more than a mental primer for the real experience. But as a means of getting commanders to think intelligently about the multiple factors that influence an urban insurgency, I would wager these games have real value.

Engineering Terrorism

I have a new piece up today at Slate about why some many engineers end up as terrorists.

The most astonishing thing I learned while doing this research was just how wrong my perception of terrorists and suicide bombers was. The idea that high level leaders in complex terrorist organizations are better educated doesn’t give me pause. But according to this article by Alan Kruger, a former Princeton economist now with the treasury, even suicide bombers in places like Gaza are likely to be wealthier and better educated than their peers.

Kruger says that crime makes a poor analogy for terrorism. A better comparison would be to voting. It’s the folks who are invested in ideas, politics and the future of the nation who bother to get out and vote, or who make the ultimate statement with their lives.

Social Suicide

I’ve got a new piece up today on the Daily Beast looking at the relationship between social media and suicide.

There is a prevailing sense among people of a certain age that kids who are sitting alone in front of their computers all the time are failing to build social skills.

But the experts in public health I talked with saw it differently. “Kids today are experts in their friends moods,” was how Christopher Le put it. Le helped write the suicide protocols for Myspace and Facebook and now runs his own company, Emotion Technology, that works on public health in the new media sphere.

I think Le’s point is important. There is definitely a sensation on services like Facebook and Twitter of constant contact. This is no substitute for deep friendships. But when a person puts out a cry for help, friends, onlookers, even strangers now respond.

Competitive Cartography

Much of the subway’s complexity stems from the fact that it originated as two competing companies. There was the Manhattan based IRT and the Brooklyn based BMT, who not only laid their tracks without heed to each other, but sometimes worked at cross purposes. The end result is that the NYC subway is one of the more convoluted underground transit systems in the world.

1924 IRT

The two companies produced separate maps that focused on their own lines, often providing sketchy detail for the competition. This IRT map from 1924 shows all the boroughs, but doesn’t include any BMT lines. Often the maps would portray the company’s lines as straight and the competition’s as crooked. “The idea was simple,” writes Andrew Dow in Telling the Passenger Where to Get Off. “The straighter the line, the faster the trip would look to a customer.”

 

Thanks

New piece up today at Obit on the strange relationship between taking lives and giving thanks.

 

Fact – the genetically modified turkeys most people eat today grow much quicker than their wild ancestors.

According to Lancaster Farming, a leading agricultural newspaper, “If a seven pound [human] baby grew at the same rate that today’s turkey grows, when the baby reaches 18 weeks of age, it would weigh 1,500 pounds.”

 

Desingosaur

June Trotta, a banker from Brooklyn, was riding the uptown 5 train into Manhattan recently, and she was lost. The train stopped at Bowling Green, Trotta checked the map. The next stop was Fulton Street, and Trotta’s ears were beginning to turn red. “Oh no,” she said, turning to the woman next to her. “Why am I back where I started?” Trotta, a native New Yorker, doesn’t normally ride the 5. “I made myself get on it today,” she explained. “I’m trying to be a grownup about this.”

228_MTA_current_400

Four-point-seven million people ride the subway every day. Many of them are grownups, and many of them are lost. Among the eight largest underground rail systems: Berlin, Chicago, London, Madrid, Moscow, Paris, Tokyo, and New York, every city except for New York has a schematic map: a simplified diagram of the routes that run beneath the city, helping passengers get from point A to point B. The New York map, by contrast, is a mash up of underground lines and above ground geography, a dinosaur of design.

Sand Hogs

An old story I had forgotten about came back to me last week. It was a piece I did for Men’s Vogue, but sadly when that magazine folded the web archives were taken down. I thought maybe I would republish some parts of the piece here for posterity.

citybeneath

The men who built the New York City subway were known as Sand Hogs.  They got dirty. They carved out the pathways that make this city work. They understood better than anyone the connection between these underground roads and the city above.

In 1916 Marchall Mabey was working beneath the East River with two other men when the pressurized shaft of the tunnel was punctured from above. As air rushed out Mabey was pulled through twelve feet of earth, through the river itself, and then ejected twenty five feet into the air.

“I was being held tight,” Mabey, the only survivor, later told reporters, “Tighter than any girl ever held me.”  Few passengers today will experience the intimacy of subway and surface as Mabey did. A pedestrian walking above a train might feel it rumbling over the tracks below. The connection between that street and trains line on a map, however, is far less concrete.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

MGMT for Rolling Stone

My first piece for Rolling Stone came out two weeks ago in print.

The piece isn’t up yet on RS.com, but a nice French blogger has posted this very clean PDF.

If and when it does go up on Rolling Stone’s website I will amend the link.

I got a chance to listen to a lot of music the boys have written and even though the tracks were rough and occasionally unpleasant as music the choruses and melodies found a way to lodge themselves deep in my brain. I catch myself singing them in the shower or while driving, which is always a good sign.

Eulogy to a Moonwalker

For a kid like me, who grew up dancing, Michael Jackson always loomed larger than life. At school, every talent show was capped by the best Jackson impersonator and every playground dance battle ended with someone busting out a full MJ routine. Even a mimic, wearing a white kitchen glove, could throw the packed school auditorium into palpitations with the right display of Jackson’s trademark moves, especially the moonwalk, which Jackson first debuted on March, 25, 1983, one day after I was born.

Michael Jackson didn’t invent the moonwalk, but he did make it his own, performing it with such technical mastery, and to such a wide audience, that the move and the man became inseparable. The legendary first performance occurred during a live television special, Motown 25: Yesterday, Today, Forever, which drew a one-night audience of 47 million people. The move comes late in the performance of his hit single “Billy Jean” and is, in essence, a simple back slide. The same move had been demonstrated by countless performers, from Cab Calloway to Fred Astaire, and was a standard among tap dancers for decades. Yet something about the way Jackson performed it that night made it stand out for the ages.

Legend has it that Jackson had learned the move from Jeffrey Daniel, a Los Angeles-born member of the British pop group Shalamar and a renowned West Coast street dancer. In fact, Daniel had performed an identical move on TV one year earlier, during an episode of Top of the Pops, and the members of Shalamar assert that much of what is today thought of as Jackson’s signature style was stolen from Daniel.

Does this matter? Not really. Musicians and dancers borrow from each other the time, and what made Jackson’s back slide different was partly virtuosity. While other dancers used the move as a gimmick, or an exit, Jackson presented it to the audience as the impossible, accomplished with otherworldly ease. Plus, he gave it a name, which modernized, and instantly canonized, what is in truth, a simple sleight of foot.

What really separated Jackson’s moonwalk from others, like Daniel, was the way it fit into a wider universe of moves he made his own.  Jackson danced his entire life, entering talent shows by age five and performing with his brothers along the Indiana chitlin’ circuit — the African-American performance route that saw the Jackson 5 opening for everyone from musicians to comedians to strippers — at the tender age of eight years old.

Jackson idolized James Brown and was a student of the television program “Soul Train,” where he saw LA performers like Jeffrey Daniel for the first time. His early dancing, captured during televised performances with the Jackson 5, draws largely on this combination: the smooth choreography of the Motown line, the furious spins and glides of James Brown and the cutting edge robotics of West Coast street dance.

This amalgam matured into Jackson’s signature style with the addition of one final element: sex. The slinky leg kicks, the pelvic thrusts and the earth shattering crotch grab were the coup de grace on a choreographic oeuvre that Jackson had been developing for years, working like punctuation to shape what had long been an improvisational style. There is a great irony to the sexuality of the “Billy Jean” performance, a song about being unjustly accused of fathering a child, in that Jackson claimed at the time to be a virgin. But for Jackson the movement was less explicitly about sex, than about defiance: a hard, confrontational edge to his dancing that formed the bedrock of the many seminal music videos and performances to come.

Ultimately these moves would spiral into the violence of videos like “Black and White” and play a foil to the disturbing sexuality that haunted his late career. Yet no amount of scandal could tarnish the kinetic appeal of his dancing, which has brought joy to people the world over, and will be imitated long after he is gone.